🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart nuclear discussions with Washington provided that it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations worked, and shared fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to resume negotiations with the US government. He claimed Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet permit the global atomic watchdog to visit attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Path

Araghchi is navigating a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Previous Talks Suddenly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that culminated with the US president claiming the facilities had been destroyed. Following this, EU nations employed their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted repeatedly they had secured an understanding with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if negotiations resume.

The American leader in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but confidentially Iran's diplomats say they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Political Position

In his speech to the gathering, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He said the assaults started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Remains the Final Solution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to impose their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and continues the final resolution to settle disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they address to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will get a reply in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and recovery, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We acquired many lessons from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to destroy. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more cohesive, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the wake of this assault."